Present:
Sue Sadler Chair PKCTG
Jane Laahs Voluntary Services Manager NHS Tayside
Mark
Scholes Head of Support Services NHS Tayside (PRI)
John Berry Public Transport Officer, P&K Council, Perth
Kathleen Coffey
WRVS
Lorraine English WRVS
Anne Munro Kinross-shire Volunteer Group and Rural Outreach Scheme
Kelvin Reay Kinross-shire Volunteer
Group and Rural Outreach Scheme
Morna Calcott Kinross-shire
Volunteer Group and Rural Outreach Scheme
Mary Dickson P&K Public Partnership Health Group
Arthur Andrews P&K Public Partnership Health
Group
Inga Appleton Pitlochry Senior Citizens
David Charity Pitlochry Senior Citizens
Eileen
Colley Alyth, Meigle and District Nursing and Samaritans
Association
Liz Lines Aberfeldy Hospital Cars
Angela Prescott Rural Development Worker PKCTG
Apologies:
Bill O’Driscoll Vice Chair PKCTG and PTU, P&K Council
Neill
Aitken On behalf of Comrie Hospital Car Service
Ian Golding Scottish Ambulance Service
Steve Robertson Scottish Ambulance Service
Dr K.E.M.
McNeill The Strathmore Surgery, Blairgowrie
Dick Laing Perth Access Cars
Isobel Watson Pitlochry Senior Citizens
Linda Taylor Voluntary Sector and Social Inclusion Officer NHS Tayside (Dundee)
Evelyn Gardiner
Head of Planning and Performance PRI Perth
1. Introductions All present gave a brief introduction
2. Why this
meeting? Sue Sadler identified that changes in transport organisation
ie the Regional Transport Strategy and changes in Ambulance Transport and eligibility were the reason for the meeting. A small
study by a Public Health Nurse had revealed that health staff feel that hospital schemes are extremely important but knew
very little of hospital cars, and often wanted to distance themselves. The Chair explained that although there is not a crisis
this feels like the right time to look at issues and hopefully reach some conclusions as to how PKCTG can support Hospital
Car Schemes. In our current funding crisis PKCTG will still continue to exist with a voluntary committee.
3. Benefits and Challenges for Hospital Car Schemes The following benefits were identified:¨
The service is used where there is a lack of public
transport¨
Volunteer satisfaction, they enjoy it – an
investment for their future¨ The
service gives provision where the PTS is not available¨ Delivering people where they need to be, when they need to be and on time with the minimum fuss¨
Personal Support is provided to users¨
The service is flexible¨
Removal of worry and concern for the user ¨
Organised hospital pick ups¨
The service provides a top quality door to door service The following
challenges were identified:¨ Those
operating the service are not carers¨ Users may use the service as a ‘choice’ to avoid the ambulance¨
There is frequently a lack of information provided
about the passenger¨ Too
much assistance is required by some passengers¨ The role of the GP and the PTS¨ Recruiting Volunteers¨ Transferring the patient/passenger from car park to hospital reception ¨
Disclosures, including complexity for organisations,
putting off volunteers and uncertain value ¨ How far do we go down the path of personal assistance?
Discussion revealed the following points:There
is a need to balance good practice with good will.There has been
a long standing issue of liability within the NHS with regard to transferring the passenger from transport to reception. Mark
Scholes confirmed that porters and hospital staff are not encouraged to go out to the parking area.The SAS policy is to transport people who may need medical intervention during the journey. There
is an ill-defined gap that doesn’t seem to be anyones responsibility. A letter was read out from a hospital car service who felt that regulations should not be applied to those who do
not need them eg groups who do not transport young or vulnerable individuals should not have to have disclosure checks or
be swept up in regulations.
4. Options for the Future
(a) Status QuoWhile
some groups might want to continue as they are, others are keen to explore the potential advantages of working together particularly
on difficult areas such as risk management and insuring against legal liabilities. However, the strength
and vitality of hospital car services lies in being organised and delivered on a very local basis, by and for local people.
Local organisation and independence must be retained.
(b)
Co-operative ActionSue Sadler tabled the PKCTG Members Support
Scheme as an example of co-operative action. This led to a discussion about disclosures and vulnerability. While all present
agreed it may be a way forward, there was concern from two groups that enforcing disclosure would mean losing volunteers.
If the members support scheme stated that all ‘new’ volunteers would have to undertake disclosure checks then
some fears may be allayed. The cost of joining the members support scheme and associated insurance was likely to be in the
region of £150. This was felt to be achievable by those present, albeit with difficulty for some.
Consideration will be given to the development of a sliding scale that reflects the level of operations of individual members.
It
was a consensus of the meeting that a Community Car Association would allow for schemes to remain entirely independent but
allow them to take advantage of working cooperatively. Cooperative action would be useful in the areas of¨
Sharing information¨
Tackling disclosures¨
Tackling insurance/risk management¨
Negotiating with other bodies such as TACTRAN, Community
Health Councils, Hospitals etc
(c) A single car schemeNobody was in favour of a regional car scheme for the whole of Perth and Kinross
as it was felt that so many of the benefits of hospital car schemes such as volunteers and fundraising depend on a local approach.
(d) Other optionsNo alternative options
were presented.
5. The Way ForwardThe Meeting agreed that there is a need to establish a Community Car Association. The Association
should meet and act separately from, but with links to PKCTG. The new Community Car Association should provide insurance for it’s members
and disclosure for new volunteers in line with the Members Support Scheme drafted by PKCTG. Sue Sadler and Angela Prescott
agreed to follow up with insurance companies and investigate the best organisational arrangements to move forward.